TY - JOUR
T1 - Between‐hospital variation in rates of complications and decline of patient performance after glioblastoma surgery in the dutch Quality Registry Neuro Surgery
AU - Kommers, Ivar
AU - Ackermans, Linda
AU - Ardon, Hilko
AU - van den Brink, Wimar A.
AU - Bouwknegt, Wim
AU - Balvers, Rutger K.
AU - van der Gaag, Niels
AU - Bosscher, Lisette
AU - Kloet, Alfred
AU - Koopmans, Jan
AU - Laan, Mark ter
AU - Tewarie, Rishi Nandoe
AU - Robe, Pierre A.
AU - van der Veer, Olivier
AU - Wagemakers, Michiel
AU - Zwinderman, Aeilko H.
AU - De Witt Hamer, Philip C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Introduction: For decisions on glioblastoma surgery, the risk of complications and decline in performance is decisive. In this study, we determine the rate of complications and performance decline after resections and biopsies in a national quality registry, their risk factors and the risk-standardized variation between institutions. Methods: Data from all 3288 adults with first-time glioblastoma surgery at 13 hospitals were obtained from a prospective population-based Quality Registry Neuro Surgery in the Netherlands between 2013 and 2017. Patients were stratified by biopsies and resections. Complications were categorized as Clavien-Dindo grades II and higher. Performance decline was considered a deterioration of more than 10 Karnofsky points at 6 weeks. Risk factors were evaluated in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Patient-specific expected and observed complications and performance declines were summarized for institutions and analyzed in funnel plots. Results: For 2271 resections, the overall complication rate was 20 % and 16 % declined in performance. For 1017 biopsies, the overall complication rate was 11 % and 30 % declined in performance. Patient-related characteristics were significant risk factors for complications and performance decline, i.e. higher age, lower baseline Karnofsky, higher ASA classification, and the surgical procedure. Hospital characteristics, i.e. case volume, university affiliation and biopsy percentage, were not. In three institutes the observed complication rate was significantly less than expected. In one institute significantly more performance declines were observed than expected, and in one institute significantly less. Conclusions: Patient characteristics, but not case volume, were risk factors for complications and performance decline after glioblastoma surgery. After risk-standardization, hospitals varied in complications and performance declines.
AB - Introduction: For decisions on glioblastoma surgery, the risk of complications and decline in performance is decisive. In this study, we determine the rate of complications and performance decline after resections and biopsies in a national quality registry, their risk factors and the risk-standardized variation between institutions. Methods: Data from all 3288 adults with first-time glioblastoma surgery at 13 hospitals were obtained from a prospective population-based Quality Registry Neuro Surgery in the Netherlands between 2013 and 2017. Patients were stratified by biopsies and resections. Complications were categorized as Clavien-Dindo grades II and higher. Performance decline was considered a deterioration of more than 10 Karnofsky points at 6 weeks. Risk factors were evaluated in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Patient-specific expected and observed complications and performance declines were summarized for institutions and analyzed in funnel plots. Results: For 2271 resections, the overall complication rate was 20 % and 16 % declined in performance. For 1017 biopsies, the overall complication rate was 11 % and 30 % declined in performance. Patient-related characteristics were significant risk factors for complications and performance decline, i.e. higher age, lower baseline Karnofsky, higher ASA classification, and the surgical procedure. Hospital characteristics, i.e. case volume, university affiliation and biopsy percentage, were not. In three institutes the observed complication rate was significantly less than expected. In one institute significantly more performance declines were observed than expected, and in one institute significantly less. Conclusions: Patient characteristics, but not case volume, were risk factors for complications and performance decline after glioblastoma surgery. After risk-standardization, hospitals varied in complications and performance declines.
KW - Glioblastoma
KW - Karnofsky performance status
KW - Neurosurgical procedures
KW - Patient outcome assessment
KW - Postoperative complications
KW - Quality of health care
KW - Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects
KW - Humans
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Risk Factors
KW - Brain Neoplasms/surgery
KW - Male
KW - Netherlands
KW - Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
KW - Glioblastoma/surgery
KW - Adult
KW - Female
KW - Registries
KW - Aged
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099816435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11060-021-03697-8
DO - 10.1007/s11060-021-03697-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 33511509
AN - SCOPUS:85099816435
SN - 0167-594X
VL - 152
SP - 289
EP - 298
JO - Journal of Neuro-Oncology
JF - Journal of Neuro-Oncology
IS - 2
ER -