Bayes and the Evidence Base: Re-Analyzing Trials Using Many Priors Does Not Contribute to Consensus

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

20 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	483-484
Number of pages	2
Journal	American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Volume	209
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202308-1455VP
Publication status	Published - 1 Mar 2024

Access to Document

@article{9c5e35d10a644b5288cedd3037dc2815,

title = "Bayes and the Evidence Base: Re-Analyzing Trials Using Many Priors Does Not Contribute to Consensus",

author = "\{de Grooth\}, Harm-Jan and Cremer, \{Olaf L\}",

year = "2024",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1164/rccm.202308-1455VP",

language = "English",

volume = "209",

pages = "483--484",

journal = "American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine",

issn = "1073-449X",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bayes and the Evidence Base

T2 - Re-Analyzing Trials Using Many Priors Does Not Contribute to Consensus

AU - de Grooth, Harm-Jan

AU - Cremer, Olaf L

PY - 2024/3/1

Y1 - 2024/3/1

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85186747956

U2 - 10.1164/rccm.202308-1455VP

DO - 10.1164/rccm.202308-1455VP

M3 - Article

C2 - 37922492

SN - 1073-449X

VL - 209

SP - 483

EP - 484

JO - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

JF - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

IS - 5

ER -