Abstract
The European Medicines Agency’s conditional marketing authorization (CMA) aims to expedite patient access to medicines for unmet medical needs by shifting a part of the drug development process post-authorization. We highlight ethical issues surrounding CMA, comprising (i) the complexity of defining unmet medical need; (ii) poor understanding of CMA and its impact on informed consent; (iii) hope versus unrealistic optimism; (iv) implications of prolonged post-authorization studies and potential patient harm; (v) rights and duties of patients surrounding participation in post-authorization studies; (vi) access to previously authorized CMA medicines; and (vii) the “benefit slippage” phenomenon, defined as the gradual shift of strict criteria to less strict criteria. We propose a comprehensive research agenda to address these ethical issues, and stress the need for multi-stakeholder engagement to ensure patient-centered use of CMA.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 1408553 |
| Journal | Frontiers in medicine |
| Volume | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 24 Jun 2024 |
Keywords
- clinical ethics
- conditional marketing authorization
- European Medicines Agency
- expedited regulatory pathways
- informed consent
- research ethics
- uncertainty
- unmet medical need
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Balancing ethical norms and duties for the introduction of new medicines through conditional marketing authorization: a research agenda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver