Balancing ethical norms and duties for the introduction of new medicines through conditional marketing authorization: a research agenda

Mariia V. Maksimova, Ghislaine J.M.W. van Thiel, Yke Tromp, Rosan Lechner, Johannes J.M. van Delden, Lourens T. Bloem*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The European Medicines Agency’s conditional marketing authorization (CMA) aims to expedite patient access to medicines for unmet medical needs by shifting a part of the drug development process post-authorization. We highlight ethical issues surrounding CMA, comprising (i) the complexity of defining unmet medical need; (ii) poor understanding of CMA and its impact on informed consent; (iii) hope versus unrealistic optimism; (iv) implications of prolonged post-authorization studies and potential patient harm; (v) rights and duties of patients surrounding participation in post-authorization studies; (vi) access to previously authorized CMA medicines; and (vii) the “benefit slippage” phenomenon, defined as the gradual shift of strict criteria to less strict criteria. We propose a comprehensive research agenda to address these ethical issues, and stress the need for multi-stakeholder engagement to ensure patient-centered use of CMA.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1408553
JournalFrontiers in medicine
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jun 2024

Keywords

  • clinical ethics
  • conditional marketing authorization
  • European Medicines Agency
  • expedited regulatory pathways
  • informed consent
  • research ethics
  • uncertainty
  • unmet medical need

Cite this