Abstract
The European Medicines Agency’s conditional marketing authorization (CMA) aims to expedite patient access to medicines for unmet medical needs by shifting a part of the drug development process post-authorization. We highlight ethical issues surrounding CMA, comprising (i) the complexity of defining unmet medical need; (ii) poor understanding of CMA and its impact on informed consent; (iii) hope versus unrealistic optimism; (iv) implications of prolonged post-authorization studies and potential patient harm; (v) rights and duties of patients surrounding participation in post-authorization studies; (vi) access to previously authorized CMA medicines; and (vii) the “benefit slippage” phenomenon, defined as the gradual shift of strict criteria to less strict criteria. We propose a comprehensive research agenda to address these ethical issues, and stress the need for multi-stakeholder engagement to ensure patient-centered use of CMA.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 1408553 |
Journal | Frontiers in medicine |
Volume | 11 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 24 Jun 2024 |
Keywords
- clinical ethics
- conditional marketing authorization
- European Medicines Agency
- expedited regulatory pathways
- informed consent
- research ethics
- uncertainty
- unmet medical need