TY - JOUR
T1 - Automated characterization of noise distributions in diffusion MRI data
AU - St-Jean, SJGRY
AU - de Luca, A
AU - Tax, Chantal
AU - Viergever, Max A.
AU - Leemans, Alexander
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank Michael Paquette for useful comments and discussion. The authors have declared no conflict of interest. The funding agencies were not involved in the design, data collection nor interpretation of this study. This research is supported by the research programme VIDI with project number 639.072.411, financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO). Samuel St-Jean is mainly supported by the Fonds de recherche du Québec - Nature et technologies (FRQNT) (Dossier 192865) and partly supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [funding reference number BP–546283–2020] and the FRQNT (Dossier 290978). Chantal M. W. Tax is supported by the research programme Rubicon with project number 680-50-1527, financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO).
Funding Information:
We would like to thank Michael Paquette for useful comments and discussion. The authors have declared no conflict of interest. The funding agencies were not involved in the design, data collection nor interpretation of this study. This research is supported by the research programme VIDI with project number 639.072.411, financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO). Samuel St-Jean is mainly supported by the Fonds de recherche du Qu?bec - Nature et technologies (FRQNT) (Dossier 192865) and partly supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [funding reference number BP?546283?2020] and the FRQNT (Dossier 290978). Chantal M. W. Tax is supported by the research programme Rubicon with project number 680-50-1527, financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - Knowledge of the noise distribution in magnitude diffusion MRI images is the centerpiece to quantify uncertainties arising from the acquisition process. The use of parallel imaging methods, the number of receiver coils and imaging filters applied by the scanner, amongst other factors, dictate the resulting signal distribution. Accurate estimation beyond textbook Rician or noncentral chi distributions often requires information about the acquisition process (e.g., coils sensitivity maps or reconstruction coefficients), which is usually not available. We introduce two new automated methods using the moments and maximum likelihood equations of the Gamma distribution to estimate noise distributions as they explicitly depend on the number of coils, making it possible to estimate all unknown parameters using only the magnitude data. A rejection step is used to make the framework automatic and robust to artifacts. Simulations using stationary and spatially varying noncentral chi noise distributions were created for two diffusion weightings with SENSE or GRAPPA reconstruction and 8, 12 or 32 receiver coils. Furthermore, MRI data of a water phantom with different combinations of parallel imaging were acquired on a 3T Philips scanner along with noise-only measurements. Finally, experiments on freely available datasets from a single subject acquired on a 3T GE scanner are used to assess reproducibility when limited information about the acquisition protocol is available. Additionally, we demonstrated the applicability of the proposed methods for a bias correction and denoising task on an in vivo dataset acquired on a 3T Siemens scanner. A generalized version of the bias correction framework for non integer degrees of freedom is also introduced. The proposed framework is compared with three other algorithms with datasets from three vendors, employing different reconstruction methods. Simulations showed that assuming a Rician distribution can lead to misestimation of the noise distribution in parallel imaging. Results on the acquired datasets showed that signal leakage in multiband can also lead to a misestimation of the noise distribution. Repeated acquisitions of in vivo datasets show that the estimated parameters are stable and have lower variability than compared methods. Results for the bias correction and denoising task show that the proposed methods reduce the appearance of noise at high b-value. The proposed algorithms herein can estimate both parameters of the noise distribution automatically, are robust to signal leakage artifacts and perform best when used on acquired noise maps.
AB - Knowledge of the noise distribution in magnitude diffusion MRI images is the centerpiece to quantify uncertainties arising from the acquisition process. The use of parallel imaging methods, the number of receiver coils and imaging filters applied by the scanner, amongst other factors, dictate the resulting signal distribution. Accurate estimation beyond textbook Rician or noncentral chi distributions often requires information about the acquisition process (e.g., coils sensitivity maps or reconstruction coefficients), which is usually not available. We introduce two new automated methods using the moments and maximum likelihood equations of the Gamma distribution to estimate noise distributions as they explicitly depend on the number of coils, making it possible to estimate all unknown parameters using only the magnitude data. A rejection step is used to make the framework automatic and robust to artifacts. Simulations using stationary and spatially varying noncentral chi noise distributions were created for two diffusion weightings with SENSE or GRAPPA reconstruction and 8, 12 or 32 receiver coils. Furthermore, MRI data of a water phantom with different combinations of parallel imaging were acquired on a 3T Philips scanner along with noise-only measurements. Finally, experiments on freely available datasets from a single subject acquired on a 3T GE scanner are used to assess reproducibility when limited information about the acquisition protocol is available. Additionally, we demonstrated the applicability of the proposed methods for a bias correction and denoising task on an in vivo dataset acquired on a 3T Siemens scanner. A generalized version of the bias correction framework for non integer degrees of freedom is also introduced. The proposed framework is compared with three other algorithms with datasets from three vendors, employing different reconstruction methods. Simulations showed that assuming a Rician distribution can lead to misestimation of the noise distribution in parallel imaging. Results on the acquired datasets showed that signal leakage in multiband can also lead to a misestimation of the noise distribution. Repeated acquisitions of in vivo datasets show that the estimated parameters are stable and have lower variability than compared methods. Results for the bias correction and denoising task show that the proposed methods reduce the appearance of noise at high b-value. The proposed algorithms herein can estimate both parameters of the noise distribution automatically, are robust to signal leakage artifacts and perform best when used on acquired noise maps.
KW - Diffusion MRI
KW - Noise estimation
KW - Parallel acceleration
KW - Gamma distribution
KW - GRAPPA
KW - SENSE
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086825264&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.media.2020.101758
DO - 10.1016/j.media.2020.101758
M3 - Article
C2 - 32599491
SN - 1361-8415
VL - 65
JO - Medical Image Analysis
JF - Medical Image Analysis
M1 - 101758
ER -