Autologous pericardium for ventricular septal defect closure

Paul H. Schoof*, Mark G. Hazekamp, Karin Van Ulzen, Margot M. Bartelings, Jan A. Bruyn, Wilhelm Helbing, Hans A. Huysmans

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and aims of the study: The use of living, untreated autologous pericardium for patch repair in the left ventricular outflow tract was considered attractive in children. Methods: Ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure with an untreated autologous pericardial patch was performed in 102 children of mean age 13.4 months (range: 1 to 73 months). Postoperative transthoracic Doppler echocardiography was performed in all children at a mean of nine weeks (range: one day to 50 weeks) after surgery. One pericardial patch, which was explanted at autopsy two months after surgery, was studied microscopically. Results: At short-term follow up, no or only minor residual VSD was found in 97 patients, moderate VSD in two and severe VSD in one patient. One patient was reoperated for residual VSD and an aneurysmic patch first diagnosed seven days after surgery. Two more patients showed ballooning of the patch without VSD after five and seven days, respectively. All aneurysmic patches were attributed to intraoperative patch oversizing. Patch integrity was confirmed in all other patients. No inflammatory or degenerative changes were observed at microscopy, rather a remodeling response had caused the patch to thicken, indicating an adaptation of the living tissue. Conclusions: The untreated autologous pericardial patch has shown to be a safe alternative for VSD closure, provided that the patch is properly sized.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)407-409
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of heart valve disease
Volume7
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Autologous pericardium for ventricular septal defect closure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this