Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation vs intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial

Jacob M van Laar, Dominique Farge, Jacob K Sont, Kamran Naraghi, Zora Marjanovic, Jérôme Larghero, Annemie J Schuerwegh, Erik W A Marijt, Madelon C Vonk, Anton V Schattenberg, Marco Matucci-Cerinic, Alexandre E Voskuyl, Arjan A van de Loosdrecht, Thomas Daikeler, Ina Kötter, Marc Schmalzing, Thierry Martin, Bruno Lioure, Stefan M Weiner, Alexander KreuterChristophe Deligny, Jean-Marc Durand, Paul Emery, Klaus P Machold, Francoise Sarrot-Reynauld, Klaus Warnatz, Daniel F P Adoue, Joël Constans, Hans-Peter Tony, Nicoletta Del Papa, Athanasios Fassas, Andrea Himsel, David Launay, Andrea Lo Monaco, Pierre Philippe, Isabelle Quéré, Éric Rich, Rene Westhovens, Bridget Griffiths, Riccardo Saccardi, Frank H van den Hoogen, Willem E Fibbe, Gérard Socié, Alois Gratwohl, Alan Tyndall,

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: High-dose immunosuppressive therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have shown efficacy in systemic sclerosis in phase 1 and small phase 2 trials.

OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy and safety of HSCT vs 12 successive monthly intravenous pulses of cyclophosphamide.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation International Scleroderma (ASTIS) trial, a phase 3, multicenter, randomized (1:1), open-label, parallel-group, clinical trial conducted in 10 countries at 29 centers with access to a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation-registered transplant facility. From March 2001 to October 2009, 156 patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis were recruited and followed up until October 31, 2013.

INTERVENTIONS: HSCT vs intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was event-free survival, defined as time from randomization until the occurrence of death or persistent major organ failure.

RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were randomly assigned to receive HSCT (n = 79) or cyclophosphamide (n = 77). During a median follow-up of 5.8 years, 53 events occurred: 22 in the HSCT group (19 deaths and 3 irreversible organ failures) and 31 in the control group (23 deaths and 8 irreversible organ failures). During the first year, there were more events in the HSCT group (13 events [16.5%], including 8 treatment-related deaths) than in the control group (8 events [10.4%], with no treatment-related deaths). At 2 years, 14 events (17.7%) had occurred cumulatively in the HSCT group vs 14 events (18.2%) in the control group; at 4 years, 15 events (19%) had occurred cumulatively in the HSCT group vs 20 events (26%) in the control group. Time-varying hazard ratios (modeled with treatment × time interaction) for event-free survival were 0.35 (95% CI, 0.16-0.74) at 2 years and 0.34 (95% CI, 0.16-0.74) at 4 years.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis, HSCT was associated with increased treatment-related mortality in the first year after treatment. However, HCST conferred a significant long-term event-free survival benefit.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN54371254.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2490-8
Number of pages9
JournalJAMA - The Journal of The American Medical Association
Volume311
Issue number24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Jun 2014

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Autografts
  • Cyclophosphamide
  • Female
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Humans
  • Immunosuppressive Agents
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Scleroderma, Diffuse
  • Survival Analysis
  • Clinical Trial, Phase III
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation vs intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this