Author reply: "Who benefits from peer review? An analysis of the outcome of 100 requests for review by plastic and reconstructive surgery."

M.P.J. Loonen; J.J. Hage; M. Kon

Author reply: "Who benefits from peer review? An analysis of the outcome of 100 requests for review by plastic and reconstructive surgery."

M.P.J. Loonen, J.J. Hage, M. Kon

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

Original language	Undefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)	580-581
Number of pages	2
Journal	Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume	118
Issue number	2
Publication status	Published - 2006
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16874271

Cite this

@article{648797048a4f4b37af86ba1351ee93d0,

title = "Author reply: {"}Who benefits from peer review? An analysis of the outcome of 100 requests for review by plastic and reconstructive surgery.{"}",

author = "M.P.J. Loonen and J.J. Hage and M. Kon",

year = "2006",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

volume = "118",

pages = "580--581",

journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",

issn = "0032-1052",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Author reply

T2 - "Who benefits from peer review? An analysis of the outcome of 100 requests for review by plastic and reconstructive surgery."

AU - Loonen, M.P.J.

AU - Hage, J.J.

AU - Kon, M.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

SN - 0032-1052

VL - 118

SP - 580

EP - 581

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

IS - 2

ER -