Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Atypical intraductal proliferation in prostate biopsy — a diagnostic grey zone with clinical implications

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP) is considered a borderline lesion, characterized by architectural complexity and cytological atypia greater than that seen in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, but insufficient to fulfil the diagnostic criteria for intraductal carcinoma (IDC). Consequently, AIP remains diagnostically challenging, and the clinical significance of this lesion is still uncertain. Emerging evidence suggests that AIP in prostate biopsy specimens is a strong predictor of unsampled IDC and other adverse pathological features, warranting reconsideration of the AIP role in prostate cancer risk stratification. Results from prospective and molecular studies indicate that AIP frequently coexists with intermediate-risk prostate cancer and shares molecular alterations with IDC, such as PTEN loss and ERG overexpression, reinforcing AIP potential as a marker of occult aggressive disease. Considering the growing emphasis on precision diagnostics and active surveillance in prostate cancer management, understanding the implications of AIP is particularly relevant.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)374-384
Number of pages11
JournalNature Reviews Urology
Volume23
Issue number6
Early online date7 Nov 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Atypical intraductal proliferation in prostate biopsy — a diagnostic grey zone with clinical implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • Author Correction: Atypical intraductal proliferation in prostate biopsy - a diagnostic grey zone with clinical implications

    Bernardino, R. M., Lobo, J., Kaouk, J., van der Kwast, T., Prendeville, S., Zattoni, F., Bianchi, L., Martini, A., Rajwa, P., Kasivisvanathan, V., Marra, G., Fleshner, N., Bernardino, R., Matsukawa, A., Stroomberg, H., Sigle, A., Scheltema, M., Roesch, M. C., Puche Sanz, I. & Miszczyk, M. & 23 others, Mercinelli, C., Maggi, M., Le Guevelou, J., Hogehout, R., Giesen, A., Fazekas, T., Fasulo, V., Falagario, U., Ambrosini, F., Zattoni, F., Soeterik, T., Rodriguez-Sanchez, L., Rajwa, P., Preisser, F., Olivier, J., Nicoletti, R., Kesch, C., Kasivisvanathan, V., Heidegger, I., Giganti, F., Bauckneht, M., Bianchi, L. & Young Academic Urologists Working Group Prostate Cancer Board, Jun 2026, In: Nature Reviews Urology. 23, 6, p. 417 1 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

    Open Access
    File
    1 Downloads (Pure)

Cite this