Assessing the test-retest reliability and smallest detectable change of the Haemophilia Activities List

Isolde A R Kuijlaars, Madelon van Emst, Janjaap van der Net, Merel A Timmer, Kathelijn Fischer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Haemophilia Activities List (HAL) is a preferred instrument to measure self-reported limitations in activities in persons with haemophilia (PWH). Information on reliability and interpretability of HAL scores is lacking.

AIM: To examine the test-retest reliability and smallest detectable change (SDC) of the HAL in adult PWH.

METHODS: Fifty adult (≥18 years) persons with mild to severe haemophilia completed the HAL (42 items, 7 domains, optimum 100) at baseline (T0) and 3-4 weeks later (T1). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and SDC were calculated for sum and component scores.

RESULTS: Fifty persons with haemophilia were included (median age 49 years; 92% haemophilia A; 70% severe haemophilia). The median (interquartile ranges) HAL sum score was 77 (62 to 99) at T0 and 81 (64 to 98) at T1. Reliability was good with ICCs for sum and component scores >0.9. The SDC for the sum score was 10.2, for the upper extremity component score 9.2, for the basic lower extremity component score 16.7 and for the complex lower extremity component score 13.4.

CONCLUSION: The HAL has a good reliability for the sum and component scores. Score changes of the normalized sum HAL score greater than the SDC 10.2 indicate that the change was not a result of measurement error.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)108-112
Number of pages5
JournalHaemophilia
Volume27
Issue number1
Early online date13 Dec 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2021

Keywords

  • activities
  • haemophilia
  • participation
  • patient-reported outcome
  • questionnaire
  • reliability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the test-retest reliability and smallest detectable change of the Haemophilia Activities List'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this