TY - JOUR
T1 - Arterio-ureteral fistula
T2 - a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire analysis
AU - Lock, Tycho M.T.W.
AU - Kamphorst, Kyara
AU - van den Bergh, Roderick C.N.
AU - Moll, Frans L.
AU - de Vries, Jean Paul P.M.
AU - Lo, Rob T.H.
AU - de Kort, Gérard A.P.
AU - Bruijnen, Rutger C.G.
AU - Dik, Pieter
AU - Horenblas, Simon
AU - de Kort, Laetitia M.O.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
© 2022. The Author(s).
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Purpose: Arterio-ureteral fistula (AUF) is an uncommon diagnosis, but potentially lethal. Although the number of reports has increased over the past two decades, the true incidence and contemporary urologists’ experience and approach in clinical practice remains unknown. This research is conducted to provide insight in the incidence of AUF in The Netherlands, and the applied diagnostic tests and therapeutic approaches in modern practice. Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire analysis was performed by sending a survey to all registered Dutch urologists. Data collection included information on experience with patients with AUF; and their medical history, diagnostics, treatment, and follow-up, and were captured in a standardized template by two independent reviewers. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: Response rate was 62% and 56 AUFs in 53 patients were reported between 2003 and 2018. The estimated incidence of AUF in The Netherlands in this time period is 3.5 AUFs per year. Hematuria was observed in all patients; 9% intermittent microhematuria, and 91% presenting with, or building up to massive hematuria. For the final diagnosis, angiography was the most efficient modality, confirming diagnosis in 58%. Treatment comprised predominantly endovascular intervention. Conclusion: The diagnosis AUF should be considered in patients with persistent intermittent or massive hematuria.
AB - Purpose: Arterio-ureteral fistula (AUF) is an uncommon diagnosis, but potentially lethal. Although the number of reports has increased over the past two decades, the true incidence and contemporary urologists’ experience and approach in clinical practice remains unknown. This research is conducted to provide insight in the incidence of AUF in The Netherlands, and the applied diagnostic tests and therapeutic approaches in modern practice. Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire analysis was performed by sending a survey to all registered Dutch urologists. Data collection included information on experience with patients with AUF; and their medical history, diagnostics, treatment, and follow-up, and were captured in a standardized template by two independent reviewers. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: Response rate was 62% and 56 AUFs in 53 patients were reported between 2003 and 2018. The estimated incidence of AUF in The Netherlands in this time period is 3.5 AUFs per year. Hematuria was observed in all patients; 9% intermittent microhematuria, and 91% presenting with, or building up to massive hematuria. For the final diagnosis, angiography was the most efficient modality, confirming diagnosis in 58%. Treatment comprised predominantly endovascular intervention. Conclusion: The diagnosis AUF should be considered in patients with persistent intermittent or massive hematuria.
KW - Arterio-ureteral fistula
KW - Endovascular procedures
KW - Hematuria
KW - Incidence
KW - Stents
KW - Vascular Fistula/diagnosis
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Humans
KW - Urinary Fistula/etiology
KW - Hematuria/epidemiology
KW - Stents/adverse effects
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
KW - Ureteral Diseases/diagnosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123464152&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00345-021-03910-3
DO - 10.1007/s00345-021-03910-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 35064800
AN - SCOPUS:85123464152
SN - 0724-4983
VL - 40
SP - 831
EP - 839
JO - World Journal of Urology
JF - World Journal of Urology
IS - 3
ER -