Are the current guidelines for performing sports with an ICD too restrictive?

Theresia A M Backhuijs*, Hilde Joosten, Pieter Zanen, Hendrik M. Nathoe, Mathias Meine, Pieter A. Doevendans, Frank J G Backx

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Current guidelines recommend against vigorous sports for all patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). In this study, we established the risk of life-threatening arrhythmias and shocks in patients with an ICD participating in sports. In this single-centre, cohort survey with 71 patients (59% male) 35%, 16 patients were defined as athlete (exercise >5 hours per week). Sports-related and clinical data were obtained using questionnaires and medical records. Median age was 38 years (19-53 years). Median follow-up period was 67 months (11-249 months). Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (VF) was the most frequent indication (20%) for implantation. There were 22 patients (31%) who experienced 127 shock episodes, of which 112 were appropriate: 15% of shocks occurred during physical exercise. Shocks did not occur more frequently in athletes (25%) compared with non-athletes (33%, p=0.760). Intensity of exercise and appropriateness of shocks were not associated. In conclusion, we found no evidence that participation in sports contributed to the risk of life-threatening arrhythmias and (in)appropriate ICD shocks in patients with an ICD. In individual cases, the advice to participate in sports could be more lenient compared with current guidelines.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-20
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Journal of Cardiology
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Keywords

  • Cardiac arrhythmias
  • Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)
  • Sports

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are the current guidelines for performing sports with an ICD too restrictive?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this