Are elevated FSH concentrations in the pre-conceptional period a risk factor for Down's syndrome pregnancies?

J. M. Van Montfrans, C. B. Lambalk*, M. H A Van Hooff, J. M G Van Vugt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent publications have reported a relation between a decreased ovarian reserve and Down's syndrome pregnancies. Using the data of a case-control study into risk factors for a Down's syndrome pregnancy, we estimated the usefulness of pre-conceptional basal follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) screening (detection rate, false positive rate, positive and negative likehood ratio, as well as the loss rate of unaffected pregnancies) to identify Down's syndrome pregnancies. The optimal detection rate of pre-conceptional basal FSH screening for Down's syndrome pregnancies was 14%, corresponding to a false positive rate of 5% and a positive likelihood ratio of 2.8. Incorporation of basal FSH screening into the regimen of first trimester serum screening followed by nuchal translucency measurement would increase the detection rate from 85 to 87%. However, basal FSH screening alone or in combination with other screening methods would cause an unacceptably high loss rate of unaffected pregnancies compared with current screening protocols, indicating that routine pre-conception basal FSH screening would not be useful to identify women at risk for a Down's syndrome pregnancy. However, when elevated basal FSH concentrations are diagnosed during subfertility evaluation, an elevated risk for a Down's syndrome pregnancy could be discussed with women who become pregnant.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1270-1273
Number of pages4
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume16
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Keywords

  • Down's syndrome
  • FSH
  • Predictive value

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are elevated FSH concentrations in the pre-conceptional period a risk factor for Down's syndrome pregnancies?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this