Applying evidence-based medicine in general practice: a video-stimulated interview study on workplace-based observation

Lisanne S Welink, Kaatje Van Roy, Roger A M J Damoiseaux, Hilde A Suijker, Peter Pype, Esther de Groot, Marie-Louise E L Bartelink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) in general practice involves applying a complex combination of best-available evidence, the patient's preferences and the general practitioner's (GP) clinical expertise in decision-making. GPs and GP trainees learn how to apply EBM informally by observing each other's consultations, as well as through more deliberative forms of workplace-based learning. This study aims to gain insight into workplace-based EBM learning by investigating the extent to which GP supervisors and trainees recognise each other's EBM behaviour through observation, and by identifying aspects that influence their recognition.

METHODS: We conducted a qualitative multicentre study based on video-stimulated recall interviews (VSI) of paired GP supervisors and GP trainees affiliated with GP training institutes in Belgium and the Netherlands. The GP pairs (n = 22) were shown fragments of their own and their partner's consultations and were asked to elucidate their own EBM considerations and the ones they recognised in their partner's actions. The interview recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed with NVivo. By comparing pairs who recognised each other's considerations well with those who did not, we developed a model describing the aspects that influence the observer's recognition of an actor's EBM behaviour.

RESULTS: Overall, there was moderate similarity between an actor's EBM behaviour and the observer's recognition of it. Aspects that negatively influence recognition are often observer-related. Observers tend to be judgemental, give unsolicited comments on how they would act themselves and are more concerned with the trainee-supervisor relationship than objective observation. There was less recognition when actors used implicit reasoning, such as mindlines (internalised, collectively reinforced tacit guidelines). Pair-related aspects also played a role: previous discussion of a specific topic or EBM decision-making generally enhanced recognition. Consultation-specific aspects played only a marginal role.

CONCLUSIONS: GP trainees and supervisors do not fully recognise EBM behaviour through observing each other's consultations. To improve recognition of EBM behaviour and thus benefit from informal observational learning, observers need to be aware of automatic judgements that they make. Creating explicit learning moments in which EBM decision-making is discussed, can improve shared knowledge and can also be useful to unveil tacit knowledge derived from mindlines.

Original languageEnglish
Article number5
JournalBMC Family Practice
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jan 2020

Keywords

  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Family medicine
  • General practice
  • Observational learning
  • Video-stimulated elicitation interviews
  • Workplace-based learning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Applying evidence-based medicine in general practice: a video-stimulated interview study on workplace-based observation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this