Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Antibiotic use from formal and informal healthcare providers in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a population-based study in two health zones

  • Brecht Ingelbeen
  • , Delphin M Phanzu
  • , Marie-France Phoba
  • , Mi Yn Budiongo
  • , Neamin M Berhe
  • , Frédéric K Kamba
  • , Lisette Kalonji
  • , Bijou Mbangi
  • , Liselotte Hardy
  • , Bieke Tack
  • , Justin Im
  • , Leonardo W Heyerdahl
  • , Raquel Inocencio Da Luz
  • , Marc Jm Bonten
  • , Octavie Lunguya
  • , Jan Jacobs
  • , Placide Mbala
  • , Marianne Ab van der Sande

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: In the Democratic Republic of Congo and other low-resource countries, community-acquired pathogens are increasingly resistant to most locally available antibiotics. To guide efforts to optimize antibiotic use to limit antibiotic resistance, we quantified healthcare provider–specific and community-wide antibiotic use. Methods: From household surveys, we estimated monthly healthcare visit rates by provider. From healthcare visit exit surveys, we estimated prevalence, defined daily doses, and access/watch/reserve distribution of antibiotic use by provider. Combining both, we estimated community-wide antibiotic use rates. Results: Of 88.7 (95% CI 81.9–95.4) healthcare visits per 1000 person-months (n = 31221), visits to private clinics (31.0, 95% CI 30.0–32.0) and primary health centres (25.5, 95% CI 24.6–26.4) were most frequent. Antibiotics were used during 64.3% (95% CI 55.2–73.5%, 162/224) of visits to private clinics, 51.1% (95% CI 45.1–57.2%, 245/469) to health centres, and 48.8% (95% CI 44.4–53.2%, 344/454) to medicine stores. Antibiotic defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day varied between 1.75 (95% CI 1.02–2.39) in rural Kimpese and 10.2 (95% CI 6.00–15.4) in (peri) urban Kisantu, mostly explained by differences in healthcare utilisation (respectively 27.8 versus 105 visits per 1000 person-months), in particular of private clinics (1.23 versus 38.6 visits) where antibiotic use is more frequent. The fraction of Watch antibiotics was 30.3% (95% CI 24.6–35.9%) in private clinics, 25.6% (95% CI 20.2–31.1%) in medicine stores, and 25.1% (95% CI 19.0–31.2%) in health centres. Treatment durations <3 days were more frequent at private clinics (5.3%, 9/169) and medicine stores (4.1%, 14/338) than at primary health centres (1.8%, 5/277). Discussion: Private healthcare providers, ubiquitous in peri-urban settings, contributed most to community-wide antibiotic use and more frequently dispensed Watch antibiotics and shortened antibiotic courses. Efforts to optimize antibiotic use should include private providers at community level.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1272-1277
Number of pages6
JournalClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Volume28
Issue number9
Early online date18 Apr 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2022

Keywords

  • Anti-bacterial agents/therapeutic use/Antibiotic use
  • Antibiotic resistance
  • Antimicrobial resistance
  • Antimicrobial stewardship
  • Cross-sectional studies
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Developing countries
  • Healthcare utilization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Antibiotic use from formal and informal healthcare providers in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a population-based study in two health zones'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this