TY - JOUR
T1 - Antibiotic effectiveness for children with lower respiratory infections
T2 - prospective cohort and trial in primary care
AU - Little, Paul
AU - Becque, Taeko
AU - Hay, Alastair D.
AU - Francis, Nick A.
AU - Stuart, Beth
AU - O’Reilly, Gilly
AU - Thompson, Natalie
AU - Hood, Kerenza
AU - Moore, Michael
AU - Verheij, Theo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©The Authors.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Background Antibiotics are commonly prescribed for children with chest infections but there is little randomised evidence and trials commonly recruit selected populations, which undermines their applicability. Aim To document the effectiveness of antibiotics for chest infections in children. Design and setting This was a prospective cohort study with nested trial in primary care. Method Children aged 1–12 years presenting with uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infections were included in the cohort. Children were either randomised to receive amoxicillin 50 mg/kg per day for 7 days or placebo, or participated in a parallel observational study, where propensity scores controlled for confounding by indication. The outcomes were duration of symptoms rated moderately bad or worse (primary outcome) and illness progression requiring hospital assessment. Results A total of 764 children participated (438 trial, 326 observational), and children were more unwell than in previous cohorts (more sputum, fever, shortness of breath). Children had been unwell for a median of 5–6 days, and symptoms rated moderately bad or worse lasted another 6 days when no antibiotics were given. With antibiotics there was a non-significant reduction of approximately 1 day in duration of symptoms rated moderately bad or worse for the whole cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95 to 1.41), similar to the trial alone (HR 1.13, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.43). The effect of antibiotic treatment on secondary outcomes was also non-significant. Conclusion Antibiotics for uncomplicated chest infections, even in a sample of more unwell children, are unlikely to be clinically very effective.
AB - Background Antibiotics are commonly prescribed for children with chest infections but there is little randomised evidence and trials commonly recruit selected populations, which undermines their applicability. Aim To document the effectiveness of antibiotics for chest infections in children. Design and setting This was a prospective cohort study with nested trial in primary care. Method Children aged 1–12 years presenting with uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infections were included in the cohort. Children were either randomised to receive amoxicillin 50 mg/kg per day for 7 days or placebo, or participated in a parallel observational study, where propensity scores controlled for confounding by indication. The outcomes were duration of symptoms rated moderately bad or worse (primary outcome) and illness progression requiring hospital assessment. Results A total of 764 children participated (438 trial, 326 observational), and children were more unwell than in previous cohorts (more sputum, fever, shortness of breath). Children had been unwell for a median of 5–6 days, and symptoms rated moderately bad or worse lasted another 6 days when no antibiotics were given. With antibiotics there was a non-significant reduction of approximately 1 day in duration of symptoms rated moderately bad or worse for the whole cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95 to 1.41), similar to the trial alone (HR 1.13, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.43). The effect of antibiotic treatment on secondary outcomes was also non-significant. Conclusion Antibiotics for uncomplicated chest infections, even in a sample of more unwell children, are unlikely to be clinically very effective.
KW - antibiotic resistance
KW - antibiotics
KW - chest infections
KW - children
KW - primary care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148782065&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0239
DO - 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0239
M3 - Article
C2 - 36823052
AN - SCOPUS:85148782065
SN - 0960-1643
VL - 73
SP - E156-E163
JO - British Journal of General Practice
JF - British Journal of General Practice
IS - 728
M1 - doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0239
ER -