TY - JOUR
T1 - Anatomical position of the mandibular condyle after open versus closed treatment of unilateral fractures
T2 - A three-dimensional analysis
AU - Buitenhuis, Margje B.
AU - Weinberg, Florine M.
AU - Bielevelt, Freek
AU - Gilijamse, Marjolijn
AU - Forouzanfar, Tymour
AU - Speksnijder, Caroline M.
AU - Rosenberg, Antoine J.W.P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - This study aimed to compare open and closed treatment for unilateral mandibular condyle neck and base fractures by final three-dimensional (3D) condylar position at 6 months follow-up. 3D position was associated with mandibular functioning and pain. A total of 21 patients received open (n = 11) or closed (n = 10) treatment. 3D positions were assessed on cone-beam computed tomography scans. Volume differences, root mean square, translations, and rotations were obtained related to the pursued anatomical position and compared between treatment groups by the Mann-Whitney U test. The 3D position parameters were associated with the maximum interincisal opening (MIO), mixing ability test (MAT), Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ), and pain based on Spearman correlation coefficients (rs). Translation in the medial-lateral direction was smaller after open treatment (P = 0.014). 3D position was not associated with the MAT; however, worse position was associated with a smaller MIO. A larger pitch rotation was associated with a worse MFIQ (rs = 0.499, P = 0.025). Volume reduction of the affected condyle was associated with more pain (rs = −0.503, P = 0.020). In conclusion, after unilateral condylar fractures, worse 3D position is associated with a smaller mouth opening and worse patient-reported outcomes. This is independent of the chosen treatment, despite a better anatomical reduction after open treatment.
AB - This study aimed to compare open and closed treatment for unilateral mandibular condyle neck and base fractures by final three-dimensional (3D) condylar position at 6 months follow-up. 3D position was associated with mandibular functioning and pain. A total of 21 patients received open (n = 11) or closed (n = 10) treatment. 3D positions were assessed on cone-beam computed tomography scans. Volume differences, root mean square, translations, and rotations were obtained related to the pursued anatomical position and compared between treatment groups by the Mann-Whitney U test. The 3D position parameters were associated with the maximum interincisal opening (MIO), mixing ability test (MAT), Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ), and pain based on Spearman correlation coefficients (rs). Translation in the medial-lateral direction was smaller after open treatment (P = 0.014). 3D position was not associated with the MAT; however, worse position was associated with a smaller MIO. A larger pitch rotation was associated with a worse MFIQ (rs = 0.499, P = 0.025). Volume reduction of the affected condyle was associated with more pain (rs = −0.503, P = 0.020). In conclusion, after unilateral condylar fractures, worse 3D position is associated with a smaller mouth opening and worse patient-reported outcomes. This is independent of the chosen treatment, despite a better anatomical reduction after open treatment.
KW - Computed tomography
KW - Fracture
KW - Mandibular condyle
KW - Maxillomandibular fixation
KW - Open fracture reduction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174206286&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcms.2023.09.013
DO - 10.1016/j.jcms.2023.09.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 37852888
AN - SCOPUS:85174206286
SN - 1010-5182
VL - 51
SP - 682
EP - 691
JO - Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 11
ER -