TY - JOUR
T1 - An International, Expert-Based Delphi Consensus Document on Controversial Issues about TransCarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR)
AU - Paraskevas, Kosmas I.
AU - AbuRahma, Ali F.
AU - Abularrage, Christopher J.
AU - Clair, Daniel G.
AU - Eldrup-Jorgensen, Jens
AU - Kashyap, Vikram S.
AU - Dardik, Alan
AU - de Borst, Gert J.
AU - Dermody, Meghan
AU - Faggioli, Gianluca
AU - Hicks, Caitlin W.
AU - Kwolek, Christopher J.
AU - Lyden, Sean P.
AU - Mansilha, Armando
AU - Van Herzeele, Isabelle
AU - Myrcha, Piotr
AU - Leal Lorenzo, Jose Ignacio
AU - Jim, Jeffrey
AU - Pini, Rodolfo
AU - Secemsky, Eric A.
AU - Spinelli, Francesco
AU - Capoccia, Laura
AU - Stone, David H.
AU - Stoner, Michael C.
AU - Zeebregts, Clark J.
AU - Lal, Brajesh K.
AU - Schneider, Peter A.
AU - Malas, Mahmoud B.
AU - Schermerhorn, Marc L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Background: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has emerged as an alternative therapeutic modality to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) for the management of patients with carotid artery stenosis. However, certain issues regarding the indications and contraindications of TCAR remain unanswered or unresolved. The aim of this international, expert-based Delphi consensus document was to attempt to provide some guidance on these topics. Methods: A 3-round Delphi consensus process was performed, including 29 experts. The aim of round 1 was to investigate the differing views and opinions of the participants. Round 2 was carried out after the results from the literature on each topic were provided to the participants. During round 3, the participants had the opportunity to finalize their vote. Results: Most participants agreed that TCAR can or can probably or possibly be performed within 14 days of a cerebrovascular event, but it is best to avoid it in the first 48 hr. It was felt that TCAR cannot or should not replace TFCAS or CEA, as each procedure has specific indications and contraindications. Symptomatic patients >80 years should probably be treated with TCAR rather than with TFCAS. TCAR can or can probably be used for the treatment of restenosis following CEA or TFCAS. Finally, there is a need for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to provide better evidence for the unresolved issues. Conclusions: This Delphi consensus document attempted to assist the decision-making of physicians or interventionalists or vascular surgeons involved in the management of carotid stenosis patients. Furthermore, areas requiring additional research were identified. Future studies and RCTs should provide more evidence to address the unanswered questions regarding TCAR.
AB - Background: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has emerged as an alternative therapeutic modality to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) for the management of patients with carotid artery stenosis. However, certain issues regarding the indications and contraindications of TCAR remain unanswered or unresolved. The aim of this international, expert-based Delphi consensus document was to attempt to provide some guidance on these topics. Methods: A 3-round Delphi consensus process was performed, including 29 experts. The aim of round 1 was to investigate the differing views and opinions of the participants. Round 2 was carried out after the results from the literature on each topic were provided to the participants. During round 3, the participants had the opportunity to finalize their vote. Results: Most participants agreed that TCAR can or can probably or possibly be performed within 14 days of a cerebrovascular event, but it is best to avoid it in the first 48 hr. It was felt that TCAR cannot or should not replace TFCAS or CEA, as each procedure has specific indications and contraindications. Symptomatic patients >80 years should probably be treated with TCAR rather than with TFCAS. TCAR can or can probably be used for the treatment of restenosis following CEA or TFCAS. Finally, there is a need for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to provide better evidence for the unresolved issues. Conclusions: This Delphi consensus document attempted to assist the decision-making of physicians or interventionalists or vascular surgeons involved in the management of carotid stenosis patients. Furthermore, areas requiring additional research were identified. Future studies and RCTs should provide more evidence to address the unanswered questions regarding TCAR.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208580798&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.09.048
DO - 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.09.048
M3 - Article
C2 - 39413993
AN - SCOPUS:85208580798
SN - 0890-5096
VL - 110
SP - 42
EP - 53
JO - Annals of Vascular Surgery
JF - Annals of Vascular Surgery
ER -