Amygdala fMRI—A Critical Appraisal of the Extant Literature

Tim Varkevisser*, Elbert Geuze, Jack van Honk

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Even before the advent of fMRI, the amygdala occupied a central space in the affective neurosciences. Yet this amygdala-centred view on emotion processing gained even wider acceptance after the inception of fMRI in the early 1990s, a landmark that triggered a goldrush of fMRI studies targeting the amygdala in vivo. Initially, this amygdala fMRI research was mostly confined to task-activation studies measuring the magnitude of the amygdala’s response to emotional stimuli. Later, interest began to shift more towards the study of the amygdala’s resting-state functional connectivity and task-based psychophysiological interactions. Later still, the test-retest reliability of amygdala fMRI came under closer scrutiny, while at the same time, amygdala-based real-time fMRI neurofeedback gained widespread popularity. Each of these major subdomains of amygdala fMRI research has left its marks on the field of affective neuroscience at large. The purpose of this review is to provide a critical assessment of this literature. By integrating the insights garnered by these research branches, we aim to answer the question: What part (if any) can amygdala fMRI still play within the current landscape of affective neuroscience? Our findings show that serious questions can be raised with regard to both the reliability and validity of amygdala fMRI. These conclusions force us to cast doubt on the continued viability of amygdala fMRI as a core pilar of the affective neurosciences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-13
JournalNeuroscience Insights
Volume19
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Amygdala
  • emotion
  • fMRI
  • functional connectivity
  • neurofeedback
  • psychophysiological interaction
  • resting-state fMRI
  • salience network
  • task-based fMRI
  • test-retest reliability

Cite this