Adverse drug events caused by three high-risk drug-drug interactions in patients admitted to intensive care units: a multicentre retrospective observational study

Joanna E Klopotowska*, Jan-Hendrik Leopold, Tinka Bakker, Izak Yasrebi-de Kom, Frouke M Engelaer, Evert de Jonge, Esther K Haspels-Hogervorst, Walter M van den Bergh, Maurits H Renes, Bas T Jong, Hans Kieft, Andre Wieringa, Stefaan Hendriks, Cedric Lau, Sjoerd H W van Bree, Hendrick J W Lammers, Peter C Wierenga, Rob J Bosman, Vincent M de Jong, Mirjam SlijkhuisEric J F Franssen, Wytze J Vermeijden, Joost Masselink, Ilse M Purmer, Liesbeth E Bosma, Martin Hoeksema, Elsbeth Wesselink, Dylan W de Lange, Nicolette F de Keizer, Dave A Dongelmans, Ameen Abu-Hanna

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

34 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aims: Knowledge about adverse drug events caused by drug–drug interactions (DDI-ADEs) is limited. We aimed to provide detailed insights about DDI-ADEs related to three frequent, high-risk potential DDIs (pDDIs) in the critical care setting: pDDIs with international normalized ratio increase (INR+) potential, pDDIs with acute kidney injury (AKI) potential, and pDDIs with QTc prolongation potential. Methods: We extracted routinely collected retrospective data from electronic health records of intensive care units (ICUs) patients (≥18 years), admitted to ten hospitals in the Netherlands between January 2010 and September 2019. We used computerized triggers (e-triggers) to preselect patients with potential DDI-ADEs. Between September 2020 and October 2021, clinical experts conducted a retrospective manual patient chart review on a subset of preselected patients, and assessed causality, severity, preventability, and contribution to ICU length of stay of DDI-ADEs using internationally prevailing standards. Results: In total 85 422 patients with ≥1 pDDI were included. Of these patients, 32 820 (38.4%) have been exposed to one of the three pDDIs. In the exposed group, 1141 (3.5%) patients were preselected using e-triggers. Of 237 patients (21%) assessed, 155 (65.4%) experienced an actual DDI-ADE; 52.9% had severity level of serious or higher, 75.5% were preventable, and 19.3% contributed to a longer ICU length of stay. The positive predictive value was the highest for DDI-INR+ e-trigger (0.76), followed by DDI-AKI e-trigger (0.57). Conclusion: The highly preventable nature and severity of DDI-ADEs, calls for action to optimize ICU patient safety. Use of e-triggers proved to be a promising preselection strategy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)164-175
Number of pages12
JournalBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Volume90
Issue number1
Early online date11 Aug 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2024

Keywords

  • adverse drug events
  • drug–drug interactions
  • intensive care
  • patient safety
  • triggers

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adverse drug events caused by three high-risk drug-drug interactions in patients admitted to intensive care units: a multicentre retrospective observational study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this