TY - JOUR
T1 - Advancing Health Equity in Europe
T2 - Explore, Tailor, Implement, and Evaluate (ETIE)-A Framework of Diversity and Fairness in Pharmacoepidemiologic Research
AU - Vallejo-Yagüe, Enriqueta
AU - de Vries, Sieta T
AU - La Parra-Casado, Daniel
AU - Gardarsdottir, Helga
AU - Faquetti, Maria Luisa
AU - van Valkengoed, Irene
AU - Aubrun, Elodie
AU - Douros, Antonios
AU - Guedes, Sandra
AU - Martinez-De La Torre, Adrian
AU - Wested, Jakob
AU - Ochi, Taichi
AU - Schumacher Dimech, Anne Marie
AU - Clair, Carole
AU - Mehta, Isha
AU - Ida, Fidelia
AU - Soriano Gabarró, Montse
AU - Korzh, Oleksii
AU - Martínez-González, María
AU - Maso, Ariadna
AU - Clamote Rodrigues, Diana
AU - Ndem-Galbert, Jackie R
AU - Korjagina, Marta
AU - Goswami, Swarnali
AU - Moga, Daniela C
AU - Marcus, Andrea Fleisch
AU - Nordeng, Hedvig
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2025/7
Y1 - 2025/7
N2 - Pharmacoepidemiology should represent and benefit populations equitably, embracing diversity and equity, and ensuring fairness. This article describes equity and fairness in pharmacoepidemiology, depicts key diversity domains, and provides an operational framework and call for action to implement diversity and fairness in pharmacoepidemiologic research. To ensure fairness, studies should address diversity and inclusion while providing equal opportunities and benefits for everyone in the target population. To implement and evaluate fairness in pharmacoepidemiology, we defined the following diversity domains: biological sex, socially constructed gender, age, life stages (e.g., pregnancy, menopause), ethnicity, race, migration, nationality, socioeconomic status, education, health literacy, and health status and capabilities. These are determinants of health, either through biological pathways or through social norms, discrimination, and barriers to healthcare or research participation. They are interlinked, their impact is study- and context-specific, and due to their sensitive and evolving nature, they should be handled with caution. Implementing diversity domains enables researchers to assess the generalizability of findings, identify and address health inequities, account for determinants of health, and ensure the fairness of algorithms, implementations, and recommendations. To successfully implement diversity domains and ensure fair pharmacoepidemiologic research, we recommend researchers to follow the Explore, Tailor, Implement, and Evaluate (ETIE) framework: Explore the role/implication of the diversity domains in the study, tailor their definitions to the study context, implement them appropriately and evaluate the study findings in their context. Increased availability of diversity data is needed, and support from stakeholders is essential. This manuscript was endorsed by the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE).
AB - Pharmacoepidemiology should represent and benefit populations equitably, embracing diversity and equity, and ensuring fairness. This article describes equity and fairness in pharmacoepidemiology, depicts key diversity domains, and provides an operational framework and call for action to implement diversity and fairness in pharmacoepidemiologic research. To ensure fairness, studies should address diversity and inclusion while providing equal opportunities and benefits for everyone in the target population. To implement and evaluate fairness in pharmacoepidemiology, we defined the following diversity domains: biological sex, socially constructed gender, age, life stages (e.g., pregnancy, menopause), ethnicity, race, migration, nationality, socioeconomic status, education, health literacy, and health status and capabilities. These are determinants of health, either through biological pathways or through social norms, discrimination, and barriers to healthcare or research participation. They are interlinked, their impact is study- and context-specific, and due to their sensitive and evolving nature, they should be handled with caution. Implementing diversity domains enables researchers to assess the generalizability of findings, identify and address health inequities, account for determinants of health, and ensure the fairness of algorithms, implementations, and recommendations. To successfully implement diversity domains and ensure fair pharmacoepidemiologic research, we recommend researchers to follow the Explore, Tailor, Implement, and Evaluate (ETIE) framework: Explore the role/implication of the diversity domains in the study, tailor their definitions to the study context, implement them appropriately and evaluate the study findings in their context. Increased availability of diversity data is needed, and support from stakeholders is essential. This manuscript was endorsed by the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE).
KW - Cultural Diversity
KW - Europe
KW - Health Equity
KW - Humans
KW - Pharmacoepidemiology/methods
U2 - 10.1002/pds.70175
DO - 10.1002/pds.70175
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40685521
SN - 1053-8569
VL - 34
JO - Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
JF - Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
IS - 7
M1 - e70175
ER -