TY - JOUR
T1 - Adjuvant capecitabine-containing chemotherapy benefit and homologous recombination deficiency in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients
AU - de Boo, Leonora W.
AU - Jóźwiak, Katarzyna
AU - Joensuu, Heikki
AU - Lindman, Henrik
AU - Lauttia, Susanna
AU - Opdam, Mark
AU - van Steenis, Charlaine
AU - Brugman, Wim
AU - Kluin, Roelof J.C.
AU - Schouten, Philip C.
AU - Kok, Marleen
AU - Nederlof, Petra M.
AU - Hauptmann, Michael
AU - Linn, Sabine C.
N1 - Funding Information:
HJ has ownership interest (including patents) at Sartar Therapeutics and is a board member, has a co-appointment at Orion Pharma and is employed by Orion Pharma and has received fees from Neutron Therapeutics. SCL reports grants from ZonMw and A Sister’s Hope during the conduct of the study. SCL is an advisory board member for AstraZeneca, Cergentis, IBM, Pfizer and Roche and received institutional research grants from Agendia, AstraZeneca, Eurocept-pharmaceuticals and Pfizer. In addition, SCL received institutional research grants and institutional non-financial support from Agendia, Genentech, Novartis, Roche, Tesaro and Immunomedics and other institutional support from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Cergentis, Daiichi Sankyo, IBM and Bayer outside the submitted work. MK is an advisory board member for BMS, Roche, MSD and Daiichi and received institutional research support from AstraZeneca, BMS and Roche outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society (Project Number 10603). The funding source had no role in study design, data collection and analyses, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/6/1
Y1 - 2022/6/1
N2 - Background: The addition of adjuvant capecitabine to standard chemotherapy of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients has improved survival in a few randomised trials and in meta-analyses. However, many patients did not benefit. We evaluated the BRCA1-like DNA copy number signature, indicative of homologous recombination deficiency, as a predictive biomarker for capecitabine benefit in the TNBC subgroup of the FinXX trial. Methods: Early-stage TNBC patients were randomised between adjuvant capecitabine-containing (TX + CEX: capecitabine-docetaxel, followed by cyclophosphamide-epirubicin-capecitabine) and conventional chemotherapy (T + CEF: docetaxel, followed by cyclophosphamide-epirubicin-fluorouracil). Tumour BRCA1-like status was determined on low-coverage, whole genome next-generation sequencing data using an established DNA comparative genomic hybridisation algorithm. Results: For 129/202 (63.9%) patients the BRCA1-like status could be determined, mostly due to lack of tissue. During a median follow-up of 10.7 years, 35 recurrences and 32 deaths occurred. Addition of capecitabine appears to improve recurrence-free survival more among 61 (47.3%) patients with non-BRCA1-like tumours (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08–0.70) compared to 68 (52.7%) patients with BRCA1-like tumours (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.24–1.81) (P-interaction = 0.17). Conclusion: Based on our data, patients with non-BRCA1-like TNBC appear to benefit from the addition of capecitabine to adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with BRCA1-like TNBC may also benefit. Additional research is needed to define the subgroup within BRCA1-like TNBC patients who may not benefit from adjuvant capecitabine.
AB - Background: The addition of adjuvant capecitabine to standard chemotherapy of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients has improved survival in a few randomised trials and in meta-analyses. However, many patients did not benefit. We evaluated the BRCA1-like DNA copy number signature, indicative of homologous recombination deficiency, as a predictive biomarker for capecitabine benefit in the TNBC subgroup of the FinXX trial. Methods: Early-stage TNBC patients were randomised between adjuvant capecitabine-containing (TX + CEX: capecitabine-docetaxel, followed by cyclophosphamide-epirubicin-capecitabine) and conventional chemotherapy (T + CEF: docetaxel, followed by cyclophosphamide-epirubicin-fluorouracil). Tumour BRCA1-like status was determined on low-coverage, whole genome next-generation sequencing data using an established DNA comparative genomic hybridisation algorithm. Results: For 129/202 (63.9%) patients the BRCA1-like status could be determined, mostly due to lack of tissue. During a median follow-up of 10.7 years, 35 recurrences and 32 deaths occurred. Addition of capecitabine appears to improve recurrence-free survival more among 61 (47.3%) patients with non-BRCA1-like tumours (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08–0.70) compared to 68 (52.7%) patients with BRCA1-like tumours (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.24–1.81) (P-interaction = 0.17). Conclusion: Based on our data, patients with non-BRCA1-like TNBC appear to benefit from the addition of capecitabine to adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with BRCA1-like TNBC may also benefit. Additional research is needed to define the subgroup within BRCA1-like TNBC patients who may not benefit from adjuvant capecitabine.
KW - Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
KW - Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
KW - Capecitabine/therapeutic use
KW - Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
KW - Cyclophosphamide/adverse effects
KW - Disease-Free Survival
KW - Docetaxel/therapeutic use
KW - Epirubicin/adverse effects
KW - Female
KW - Homologous Recombination
KW - Humans
KW - Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85124253749
U2 - 10.1038/s41416-022-01711-y
DO - 10.1038/s41416-022-01711-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 35124703
AN - SCOPUS:85124253749
SN - 0007-0920
VL - 126
SP - 1401
EP - 1409
JO - British Journal of Cancer
JF - British Journal of Cancer
IS - 10
ER -