Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Addressing persistent evidence gaps in cardiovascular sex differences research – the potential of clinical care data

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Women have historically been underrepresented in cardiovascular clinical trials, resulting in a lack of sex-specific data. This is especially problematic in two situations, namely those where diseases manifest differently in women and men and those where biological differences between the sexes might affect the efficacy and/or safety of medication. There is therefore a pressing need for datasets with proper representation of women to address questions related to these situations. Clinical care data could fit this bill nicely because of their unique broad scope across both patient groups and clinical measures. This perspective piece presents the potential of clinical care data in sex differences research and discusses current challenges clinical care data-based research faces. It also suggests strategies to reduce the effect of these limitations, and explores whether clinical care data alone will be sufficient to close evidence gaps or whether a more comprehensive approach is needed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1006425
JournalFrontiers in global women's health
Volume3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jan 2022

Keywords

  • cardiovascular disease
  • electronic health records (EHR)
  • epidemiology
  • real world evidence (RWE)
  • sex differences
  • women

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Addressing persistent evidence gaps in cardiovascular sex differences research – the potential of clinical care data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this