Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Adagrasib versus docetaxel in KRASG12C-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (KRYSTAL-12): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

  • Fabrice Barlesi
  • , Wenxiu Yao
  • , Michaël Duruisseaux
  • , Ludovic Doucet
  • , Aitor Azkárate Martínez
  • , Vanesa Gregorc
  • , Oscar Juan-Vidal
  • , Shun Lu
  • , Charlotte De Bondt
  • , Filippo de Marinis
  • , Helena Linardou
  • , Young-Chul Kim
  • , Robert Jotte
  • , Enriqueta Felip
  • , Giuseppe Lo Russo
  • , Martin Reck
  • , Mary F Michenzie
  • , Wenjing Yang
  • , Julie N Meade
  • , Beata Korytowsky
  • Tony S K Mok,

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Adagrasib is a KRASG12C inhibitor that demonstrated promising activity against KRASG12C-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a phase 2 trial. Here we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of adagrasib versus docetaxel in patients with KRASG12C-mutated advanced NSCLC previously treated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Methods: KRYSTAL-12 is a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial conducted at 230 centres in 22 countries. Patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS)G12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, who had previously received both platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 or anti-programmed death ligand 1 therapy, were randomly allocated in a 2:1 ratio to receive 600 mg adagrasib (twice a day orally) or 75 mg/m2 docetaxel (every 3 weeks intravenously) using a centralised interactive web response system. Randomisation was stratified by region (non-Asia–Pacific vs Asia–Pacific) and previous treatment (sequential vs concurrent chemotherapy or immunotherapy). Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, investigator or patient decision, or death. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review in all randomised patients (intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Safety was assessed in all treated patients. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04685135), and is active but no longer recruiting. Findings: Between Feb 23, 2021, and Nov 16, 2023, 453 patients were randomly allocated to receive adagrasib (301 [66%]) or docetaxel (152 [34%]). In each group, 298 (99%) patients received adagrasib and 140 (92%) received docetaxel. In the ITT population (median follow-up 7·2 months [95% CI 5·8–8·7]), median progression-free survival was 5·5 months (95% CI 4·5–6·7) with adagrasib and 3·8 months (95% CI 2·7–4·7) with docetaxel (hazard ratio 0·58 [95% CI 0·45–0·76]; p<0·0001). Grade 3 and above treatment-related adverse events occurred in 140 (47%) of 298 patients treated with adagrasib and 64 (46%) of 140 with docetaxel. There were four (1%) treatment-related deaths in the adagrasib group and one (1%) treatment-related death in the docetaxel group. Interpretation: Adagrasib demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival over docetaxel in patients with previously treated KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC, without new safety signals. Funding: Mirati Therapeutics, a Bristol Myers Squibb company.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)615-626
Number of pages12
JournalLancet (London, England)
Volume406
Issue number10503
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Aug 2025

Keywords

  • Acetonitriles
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy
  • Docetaxel/therapeutic use
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mutation
  • Piperazines
  • Progression-Free Survival
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics
  • Pyrimidines/therapeutic use

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adagrasib versus docetaxel in KRASG12C-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (KRYSTAL-12): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this