Abstract
Background: Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who have mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) are at increased risk of developing PD dementia (PDD). Therefore, it is important to identify PD-MCI in a reliable way.
Objectives: We evaluated the accuracy of the Parkinson's Disease-Cognitive Rating Scale (PD-CRS) and the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale-2 (MDRS-2) for detecting PD-MCI. Data from healthy subjects were used to correct for demographic influences.
Methods: We compared the accuracy of the two instruments using ROC analysis. The gold standard was level II diagnosis of PD-MCI according to consensus criteria of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Results: Seventy-five healthy subjects and 125 PD patients were included. Education level, age and sex correlated with the PD-CRS, but only age correlated with the MDRS-2. Twenty-seven percent of the patients had PD-MCI. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for raw scores of PD-CRS and MDRS-2 were 0.83 and 0.81, respectively. At the optimal cut-off for the PD-CRS (101/102), sensitivity was 88% and specificity was 64%. For the MDRS-2 (139/140) sensitivity and specificity were 68% and 79%, respectively.AUCs for demographically corrected scores of PD-CRS and for age-corrected scores of MDRS-2 were 0.80 and 0.78, respectively. At the optimal cut-off for the PD-CRS, sensitivity was 79% and specificity was 72%, while for the MDRS-2 these were 77% and 67%, respectively.
Conclusions: Both cognitive screening tools are suitable for distinguishing PD-MCI patients from cognitively intact PD patients. Demographical correction of scores did not improve sensitivity and specificity.
Objectives: We evaluated the accuracy of the Parkinson's Disease-Cognitive Rating Scale (PD-CRS) and the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale-2 (MDRS-2) for detecting PD-MCI. Data from healthy subjects were used to correct for demographic influences.
Methods: We compared the accuracy of the two instruments using ROC analysis. The gold standard was level II diagnosis of PD-MCI according to consensus criteria of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Results: Seventy-five healthy subjects and 125 PD patients were included. Education level, age and sex correlated with the PD-CRS, but only age correlated with the MDRS-2. Twenty-seven percent of the patients had PD-MCI. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for raw scores of PD-CRS and MDRS-2 were 0.83 and 0.81, respectively. At the optimal cut-off for the PD-CRS (101/102), sensitivity was 88% and specificity was 64%. For the MDRS-2 (139/140) sensitivity and specificity were 68% and 79%, respectively.AUCs for demographically corrected scores of PD-CRS and for age-corrected scores of MDRS-2 were 0.80 and 0.78, respectively. At the optimal cut-off for the PD-CRS, sensitivity was 79% and specificity was 72%, while for the MDRS-2 these were 77% and 67%, respectively.
Conclusions: Both cognitive screening tools are suitable for distinguishing PD-MCI patients from cognitively intact PD patients. Demographical correction of scores did not improve sensitivity and specificity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 259-264 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Movement Disorders Clinical Practice |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 23 Mar 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Mattis Dementia Rating Scale‐2
- Parkinson's Disease‐Cognitive Rating Scale
- Parkinson's disease
- cognitive screening
- mild cognitive impairment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Accuracy of Two Cognitive Screening Tools to Detect Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver