TY - JOUR
T1 - Accuracy of pre-hospital trauma triage and field triage decision rules in children (P2-T2 study)
T2 - an observational study
AU - van der Sluijs, Rogier
AU - Lokerman, Robin D.
AU - Waalwijk, Job F.
AU - de Jongh, Mariska A.C.
AU - Edwards, Michael J.R.
AU - den Hartog, Dennis
AU - Giannakópoulos, Georgios F.
AU - van Grunsven, Pierre M.
AU - Poeze, Martijn
AU - Leenen, Luke P.H.
AU - van Heijl, Mark
AU - Lansink, Koen W.W.
AU - Breeman, Wim
AU - Bevelander, Timo
AU - Siegers, Arjen
AU - van Vliet, Risco
AU - Verhagen, Thijs M.F.
AU - Hoogeveen, Margreet W.M.J.
AU - Sturms, Leontien M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was partly funded by grants from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) and the Innovation Fund Health Insurers. We thank the research staff from all participating sites and all participating members of the Pre-hospital Trauma Triage Research Collaborative. We thank our research assistants: Alexander de la Mar, Annemiek Vuurens, Dunja Scheepmaker, and Toril Lintzen. Finally, we would like to thank Jill Whittaker for her advice on writing style.
Funding Information:
This study was partly funded by grants from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) and the Innovation Fund Health Insurers. We thank the research staff from all participating sites and all participating members of the Pre-hospital Trauma Triage Research Collaborative. We thank our research assistants: Alexander de la Mar, Annemiek Vuurens, Dunja Scheepmaker, and Toril Lintzen. Finally, we would like to thank Jill Whittaker for her advice on writing style.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/4
Y1 - 2020/4
N2 - Background: Adequate pre-hospital trauma triage is crucial to enable optimal care in inclusive trauma systems. Transport of children in need of specialised trauma care to lower-level trauma centres is associated with adverse patient outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of paediatric field triage based on patient destination and triage tools. Methods: We did a multisite observational study (P2-T2) of all children (aged <16 years) transported with high priority by ambulance from the scene of injury to any emergency department in seven of 11 inclusive trauma regions in the Netherlands. Diagnostic accuracy based on the initial transport destination was evaluated in terms of undertriage rate (ie, the proportion of patients in need of specialised trauma care who were initially transported to a lower-level paediatric or adult trauma centre) and overtriage rate (ie, the proportion of patients not requiring specialised trauma care who were transported to a level-I [highest level] paediatric trauma centre). The Dutch National Protocol of Ambulance Services and Field Triage Decision Scheme triage protocols were externally validated using data from this cohort against an anatomical (Injury Severity Score [ISS] ≥16) and a resource-based reference standard. Findings: Between Jan 1, 2015, and Dec 31, 2017, 12 915 children (median age 10·3 years, IQR 4·2–13·6) were transported to the emergency department with injuries. 4091 (31·7%) patients were admitted to hospital, of whom 129 (3·2%) patients had an ISS of 16 or greater and 227 (5·5%) patients used critical resources within a limited timeframe. Ten patients died within 24 h of arrival at the emergency department. Based on the primary reference standard (ISS ≥16), the undertriage rate was 16·3% (95% CI 10·8–23·7) and the overtriage rate was 21·2% (20·5–22·0). The National Protocol of Ambulance Services had a sensitivity of 53·5% (95% CI 43·9–62·9) and a specificity of 94·0% (93·4–94·6), and the Field Triage Decision Scheme had a sensitivity of 64·5% (54·1–74·1) and a specificity of 84·3% (83·1–85·5). Interpretation: Too many children in need of specialised care were transported to lower-level paediatric or adult trauma centres, which is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Current protocols cannot accurately discriminate between patients at low and high risk, and highly sensitive and child-specific triage tools need to be developed to ensure the right patient is transported to the right hospital. Funding: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Innovation Fund Health Insurers.
AB - Background: Adequate pre-hospital trauma triage is crucial to enable optimal care in inclusive trauma systems. Transport of children in need of specialised trauma care to lower-level trauma centres is associated with adverse patient outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of paediatric field triage based on patient destination and triage tools. Methods: We did a multisite observational study (P2-T2) of all children (aged <16 years) transported with high priority by ambulance from the scene of injury to any emergency department in seven of 11 inclusive trauma regions in the Netherlands. Diagnostic accuracy based on the initial transport destination was evaluated in terms of undertriage rate (ie, the proportion of patients in need of specialised trauma care who were initially transported to a lower-level paediatric or adult trauma centre) and overtriage rate (ie, the proportion of patients not requiring specialised trauma care who were transported to a level-I [highest level] paediatric trauma centre). The Dutch National Protocol of Ambulance Services and Field Triage Decision Scheme triage protocols were externally validated using data from this cohort against an anatomical (Injury Severity Score [ISS] ≥16) and a resource-based reference standard. Findings: Between Jan 1, 2015, and Dec 31, 2017, 12 915 children (median age 10·3 years, IQR 4·2–13·6) were transported to the emergency department with injuries. 4091 (31·7%) patients were admitted to hospital, of whom 129 (3·2%) patients had an ISS of 16 or greater and 227 (5·5%) patients used critical resources within a limited timeframe. Ten patients died within 24 h of arrival at the emergency department. Based on the primary reference standard (ISS ≥16), the undertriage rate was 16·3% (95% CI 10·8–23·7) and the overtriage rate was 21·2% (20·5–22·0). The National Protocol of Ambulance Services had a sensitivity of 53·5% (95% CI 43·9–62·9) and a specificity of 94·0% (93·4–94·6), and the Field Triage Decision Scheme had a sensitivity of 64·5% (54·1–74·1) and a specificity of 84·3% (83·1–85·5). Interpretation: Too many children in need of specialised care were transported to lower-level paediatric or adult trauma centres, which is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Current protocols cannot accurately discriminate between patients at low and high risk, and highly sensitive and child-specific triage tools need to be developed to ensure the right patient is transported to the right hospital. Funding: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Innovation Fund Health Insurers.
KW - Adolescent
KW - Child
KW - Child, Preschool
KW - Data Accuracy
KW - Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration
KW - Female
KW - Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data
KW - Humans
KW - Injury Severity Score
KW - Male
KW - Netherlands/epidemiology
KW - Predictive Value of Tests
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
KW - Transportation of Patients/methods
KW - Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data
KW - Triage/methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081672975&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30431-6
DO - 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30431-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 32014121
AN - SCOPUS:85081672975
SN - 2352-4642
VL - 4
SP - 290
EP - 298
JO - The Lancet Child and Adolescent Health
JF - The Lancet Child and Adolescent Health
IS - 4
ER -