TY - JOUR
T1 - Accuracy of iodine quantification using dual energy CT in latest generation dual source and dual layer CT
AU - Pelgrim, Gert Jan
AU - van Hamersvelt, Robbert W
AU - Willemink, Martin J
AU - Schmidt, Bernhard T
AU - Flohr, Thomas
AU - Schilham, Arnold
AU - Milles, Julien
AU - Oudkerk, Matthijs
AU - Leiner, Tim
AU - Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn
N1 - Funding Information:
This study has received funding by a personal grant of R. Vliegenthart from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, The Author(s).
PY - 2017/9
Y1 - 2017/9
N2 - Objective: To determine the accuracy of iodine quantification with dual energy computed tomography (DECT) in two high-end CT systems with different spectral imaging techniques. Methods: Five tubes with different iodine concentrations (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 mg/ml) were analysed in an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. Adding two phantom rings simulated increased patient size. For third-generation dual source CT (DSCT), tube voltage combinations of 150Sn and 70, 80, 90, 100 kVp were analysed. For dual layer CT (DLCT), 120 and 140 kVp were used. Scans were repeated three times. Median normalized values and interquartile ranges (IQRs) were calculated for all kVp settings and phantom sizes. Results: Correlation between measured and known iodine concentrations was excellent for both systems (R = 0.999–1.000, p < 0.0001). For DSCT, median measurement errors ranged from −0.5% (IQR −2.0, 2.0%) at 150Sn/70 kVp and −2.3% (IQR −4.0, −0.1%) at 150Sn/80 kVp to −4.0% (IQR −6.0, −2.8%) at 150Sn/90 kVp. For DLCT, median measurement errors ranged from −3.3% (IQR −4.9, −1.5%) at 140 kVp to −4.6% (IQR −6.0, −3.6%) at 120 kVp. Larger phantom sizes increased variability of iodine measurements (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Iodine concentration can be accurately quantified with state-of-the-art DECT systems from two vendors. The lowest absolute errors were found for DSCT using the 150Sn/70 kVp or 150Sn/80 kVp combinations, which was slightly more accurate than 140 kVp in DLCT. Key Points: • High-end CT scanners allow accurate iodine quantification using different DECT techniques. • Lowest measurement error was found in scans with largest photon energy separation. • Dual-source CT quantified iodine slightly more accurately than dual layer CT.
AB - Objective: To determine the accuracy of iodine quantification with dual energy computed tomography (DECT) in two high-end CT systems with different spectral imaging techniques. Methods: Five tubes with different iodine concentrations (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 mg/ml) were analysed in an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. Adding two phantom rings simulated increased patient size. For third-generation dual source CT (DSCT), tube voltage combinations of 150Sn and 70, 80, 90, 100 kVp were analysed. For dual layer CT (DLCT), 120 and 140 kVp were used. Scans were repeated three times. Median normalized values and interquartile ranges (IQRs) were calculated for all kVp settings and phantom sizes. Results: Correlation between measured and known iodine concentrations was excellent for both systems (R = 0.999–1.000, p < 0.0001). For DSCT, median measurement errors ranged from −0.5% (IQR −2.0, 2.0%) at 150Sn/70 kVp and −2.3% (IQR −4.0, −0.1%) at 150Sn/80 kVp to −4.0% (IQR −6.0, −2.8%) at 150Sn/90 kVp. For DLCT, median measurement errors ranged from −3.3% (IQR −4.9, −1.5%) at 140 kVp to −4.6% (IQR −6.0, −3.6%) at 120 kVp. Larger phantom sizes increased variability of iodine measurements (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Iodine concentration can be accurately quantified with state-of-the-art DECT systems from two vendors. The lowest absolute errors were found for DSCT using the 150Sn/70 kVp or 150Sn/80 kVp combinations, which was slightly more accurate than 140 kVp in DLCT. Key Points: • High-end CT scanners allow accurate iodine quantification using different DECT techniques. • Lowest measurement error was found in scans with largest photon energy separation. • Dual-source CT quantified iodine slightly more accurately than dual layer CT.
KW - Tomography, x-ray computed
KW - Absorptiometry, photon
KW - Myocardial perfusion imaging
KW - Phantoms imaging
KW - Iodine
KW - Myocardial perfusion imaging
KW - Phantoms, imaging
KW - Iodine
KW - Absorptiometry, Photon/methods
KW - Myocardial Perfusion Imaging/methods
KW - Ioxaglic Acid/analysis
KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
KW - Humans
KW - Contrast Media/analysis
KW - Radiation Dosage
KW - Iodine/analysis
KW - Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging
KW - Phantoms, Imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011663104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00330-017-4752-9
DO - 10.1007/s00330-017-4752-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 28168368
SN - 0938-7994
VL - 27
SP - 3904
EP - 3912
JO - European Radiology
JF - European Radiology
IS - 9
ER -