Absolute first trimester cell-free DNA levels and their associations with adverse pregnancy outcomes

Florentine F Thurik, Marije Lamain-de Ruiter, Ahmad Javadi, Anneke Kwee, Heleen Woortmeijer, Godelieve C M L Page-Christiaens, Arie Franx, C Ellen van der Schoot, Maria P H Koster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study associations of first trimester cell-free fetal DNA levels (in this paper referred to as cell-free placental DNA (cfpDNA) levels) and preeclampsia (PE), pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), gestational diabetes (GDM) and spontaneous preterm birth (sPB).

METHOD: A nested case-control study was conducted in first trimester samples (gestational age 8(+0) -13(+6)  weeks). A total of 226 cases and 301 controls were included. CfpDNA levels were quantified in male-bearing pregnancies using real-time DYS14-PCRs on DNA isolated from maternal serum. CfpDNA multiples of the median (MoMs) were calculated based on associations with patient characteristics (body mass index, parity, ethnicity and smoking). Associations between MoMs and adverse outcomes were studied.

RESULTS: Cell-free placental DNA levels were negatively associated with body mass index (β = -0.297, p < 0.001) and smoking (β = -0.163, p = 0.006). MoMs were lower in women who later developed PIH (n = 84, p = 0.009) or GDM (n = 56, p = 0.037). There was no association between cfpDNA MoMs and PE (n = 37, p = 0.15) or sPB (n = 49, p = 0.19). CfpDNA was positively correlated with pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (r = 0.426, p < 0.001) but not with placental growth factor (r = 0.059, p = 0.179).

CONCLUSION: Adjusted first trimester cfpDNA levels are associated with PIH and GDM but probably not with PE or sPB. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1104–1111
JournalPrenatal Diagnosis
Volume36
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Absolute first trimester cell-free DNA levels and their associations with adverse pregnancy outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this