ABCDEF Bundle and Supportive ICU Practices for Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection: An International Point Prevalence Study

Keibun Liu, Kensuke Nakamura, Hajime Katsukawa, Muhammed Elhadi, Peter Nydahl, Eugene Wesley Ely, Sapna R Kudchadkar, Kunihiko Takahashi, Shigeaki Inoue, Alan Kawarai Lefor, Jozef Kesecioglu, Osamu Nishida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate implementation of evidence-based and supportive cares in ICUs, such as the ABCDEF, nutrition therapy, and ICU diary, for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection in ICUs and their association with ICU clinical practice and setting.

Design: A worldwide, 2-day point prevalence study.

Setting: The study was carried out on June 3, 2020, and July 1, 2020. A total of 212 ICUs in 38 countries participated. Clinicians in each participating ICU completed web-based online surveys.

Patients: The ICU patients with coronavirus disease 2019.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and Main results: The implementation rate for the elements of the ABCDEF bundle, other supportive ICU care measures, and implementation-associated structures were investigated. Data were collected for 262 patients, of whom 47.3% underwent mechanical ventilation and 4.6% were treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Each element was implemented for the following percentages of patients: elements A (regular pain assessment), 45%; B (both spontaneous awakening and breathing trials), 28%; C (regular sedation assessment), 52%; D (regular delirium assessment), 35%; E (early mobility and exercise), 47%; and F (family engagement and empowerment), 16%. The implementation of element E was 4% for patients on mechanical ventilation and 8% for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Supportive care, such as protein provision throughout the ICU stay (under 1.2 g/kg for more than 50% of the patients) and introduction of ICU diary (25%), was infrequent. Implementation rates of elements A and D were higher in ICUs with specific protocols and fewer ICU beds exclusively for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection. Element E was implemented at a higher rate in ICUs that had more ICU beds assigned for them.

Conclusions: This point prevalence study showed low implementation of the ABCDEF bundle. Specific protocols and the number of ICU beds reserved for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection might be key factors for delivering appropriate supportive care.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0353
Pages (from-to)1-16
JournalCritical care explorations
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021

Keywords

  • intensive care unit liberation bundle
  • novel coronavirus
  • pandemic
  • postintensive care syndrome
  • quality improvement
  • supportive care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ABCDEF Bundle and Supportive ICU Practices for Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection: An International Point Prevalence Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this