TY - JOUR
T1 - A survey of medical image registration - under review
AU - Viergever, Max A
AU - Maintz, J B Antoine
AU - Klein, Stefan
AU - Murphy, Keelin
AU - Staring, Marius
AU - Pluim, JPW
N1 - Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - A retrospective view on the past two decades of the field of medical image registration is presented, guided by the article "A survey of medical image registration" (Maintz and Viergever, 1998). It shows that the classification of the field introduced in that article is still usable, although some modifications to do justice to advances in the field would be due. The main changes over the last twenty years are the shift from extrinsic to intrinsic registration, the primacy of intensity-based registration, the breakthrough of nonlinear registration, the progress of inter-subject registration, and the availability of generic image registration software packages. Two problems that were called urgent already 20 years ago, are even more urgent nowadays: Validation of registration methods, and translation of results of image registration research to clinical practice. It may be concluded that the field of medical image registration has evolved, but still is in need of further development in various aspects.
AB - A retrospective view on the past two decades of the field of medical image registration is presented, guided by the article "A survey of medical image registration" (Maintz and Viergever, 1998). It shows that the classification of the field introduced in that article is still usable, although some modifications to do justice to advances in the field would be due. The main changes over the last twenty years are the shift from extrinsic to intrinsic registration, the primacy of intensity-based registration, the breakthrough of nonlinear registration, the progress of inter-subject registration, and the availability of generic image registration software packages. Two problems that were called urgent already 20 years ago, are even more urgent nowadays: Validation of registration methods, and translation of results of image registration research to clinical practice. It may be concluded that the field of medical image registration has evolved, but still is in need of further development in various aspects.
KW - Medical image registration
U2 - 10.1016/j.media.2016.06.030
DO - 10.1016/j.media.2016.06.030
M3 - Editorial
C2 - 27427472
SN - 1361-8415
VL - 33
SP - 140
EP - 144
JO - Medical Image Analysis
JF - Medical Image Analysis
ER -