TY - JOUR
T1 - A standard set of outcome measures for the comprehensive assessment of osteogenesis imperfecta
AU - Nijhuis, Wouter
AU - Franken, Anton
AU - Ayers, Kara
AU - Damas, Chantal
AU - Folkestad, Lars
AU - Forlino, Antonella
AU - Fraschini, Paolo
AU - Hill, Claire
AU - Janus, Guus
AU - Kruse, Richard
AU - Lande Wekre, Lena
AU - Michiels, Lieve
AU - Montpetit, Kathleen
AU - Panzeri, Leonardo
AU - Porquet-Bordes, Valerie
AU - Rauch, Frank
AU - Sakkers, Ralph
AU - Salles, Jean Pierre
AU - Semler, Oliver
AU - Sun, Jony
AU - To, Michael
AU - Tosi, Laura
AU - Yao, Yangyang
AU - Yeung, Eric Hiu Kwong
AU - Zhytnik, Lidiia
AU - Zillikens, Maria Carola
AU - Verhoef, Marjolein
N1 - Funding Information:
Most work was done as a volunteer effort of all parties involved. Limited funding was provided by the Care4BrittleBones Foundation based on crowdfunding in the OI-community (no funding from industry).
Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge Dagmar Mekking and the Care4Brittle Bones Foundation for initiating and supporting this project. The Key4OI is owned by Foundation Care4BrittleBones on behalf of everyone who contributed to its development. We gratefully acknowledge Pauline Scholten for her support in the literature search, creating a database accessible to the entire working group and preparing the content for the meetings.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/3/20
Y1 - 2021/3/20
N2 - Background: Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) is a genetic disorder also known as ‘brittle bone disease’. The clinical manifestation of OI shows a wide variation. Therefore, care for patients with OI requires an interdisciplinary approach. The effectiveness of particular interventions and treatment protocols of interdisciplinary teams is not clear due to a non-standardized and wide variation of patient outcomes thus making the comparison of outcome measures available in the literature difficult. It is only by agreeing on a common, standard set of outcome measures for the comprehensive appraisal of OI that comparisons across interdisciplinary treatment centers for OI will be possible in the future. Methods: The Key4OI international interdisciplinary working group of 27 members used a consensus-driven modified Delphi approach to develop a set of global outcome measures for patients with OI. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), was used to define domains and organize the outcomes from the literature search. After reviewing the outcomes extracted from the literature, trials and registries, the working group agreed on a final selection of domains and their definition (ICF definition as well as a lay description). These domains were then presented to the focus groups who prioritized the outcome domains by taking into account the items important to the OI community. All content was collected and analyzed and final domains were determined. A consensus of appropriate measuring instruments for each domain was reached with Delphi rounds. The entire approach was in line with the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement ICHOM methodology. Results: More than 400 different outcome measures were identified in our literature search. After three Delphi rounds, 24 domains were selected. After the focus group sessions, the number of domains were reduced to 15. A consensus was reached on the measuring instruments to cover these domains for both children and adults. Conclusion: The Key4OI project resulted in standard set of outcome measures focused on the needs and wishes of individuals with OI and their families. This outcome set will enable healthcare teams and systems to compare and to improve their care pathways and quality of care worldwide. Further studies are needed to evaluate the implementation of this standardized outcome set.
AB - Background: Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) is a genetic disorder also known as ‘brittle bone disease’. The clinical manifestation of OI shows a wide variation. Therefore, care for patients with OI requires an interdisciplinary approach. The effectiveness of particular interventions and treatment protocols of interdisciplinary teams is not clear due to a non-standardized and wide variation of patient outcomes thus making the comparison of outcome measures available in the literature difficult. It is only by agreeing on a common, standard set of outcome measures for the comprehensive appraisal of OI that comparisons across interdisciplinary treatment centers for OI will be possible in the future. Methods: The Key4OI international interdisciplinary working group of 27 members used a consensus-driven modified Delphi approach to develop a set of global outcome measures for patients with OI. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), was used to define domains and organize the outcomes from the literature search. After reviewing the outcomes extracted from the literature, trials and registries, the working group agreed on a final selection of domains and their definition (ICF definition as well as a lay description). These domains were then presented to the focus groups who prioritized the outcome domains by taking into account the items important to the OI community. All content was collected and analyzed and final domains were determined. A consensus of appropriate measuring instruments for each domain was reached with Delphi rounds. The entire approach was in line with the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement ICHOM methodology. Results: More than 400 different outcome measures were identified in our literature search. After three Delphi rounds, 24 domains were selected. After the focus group sessions, the number of domains were reduced to 15. A consensus was reached on the measuring instruments to cover these domains for both children and adults. Conclusion: The Key4OI project resulted in standard set of outcome measures focused on the needs and wishes of individuals with OI and their families. This outcome set will enable healthcare teams and systems to compare and to improve their care pathways and quality of care worldwide. Further studies are needed to evaluate the implementation of this standardized outcome set.
KW - Brittle bone disease
KW - Clinical outcome measures
KW - Continuous quality improvement
KW - Learning health care
KW - Osteogenesis imperfecta
KW - Outcomes
KW - Patient-reported outcomes measures
KW - Value-based health care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103174185&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13023-021-01682-y
DO - 10.1186/s13023-021-01682-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 33743784
AN - SCOPUS:85103174185
SN - 1750-1172
VL - 16
JO - Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
JF - Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
IS - 1
M1 - 140
ER -