Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A prospective comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy in the evaluation of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding: Clinical implications

  • Mark H. Emanuel*
  • , Marion J. Verdel
  • , Kees Wamsteker
  • , Frits B. Lammes
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

124 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We determined the diagnostic vaue of transvaginal ultrasonography for endometrial and intrauterine abnormalities in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. STUDY DESIGN: Between June 1, 1992, and June 1, 1993, 279 consecutive patients underwent transvaginal ultrasonography. Findings were compared with the final diagnosis established by diagnostic hysteroscopy and histologic examination. RESULTS: Transvaginal ultrasonography demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.96 and a specificity of 0.89. With a pretest probability (prevalence) of 0.42, this resulted in posttest probabilities of 0.03 in the case of a normal sonogram and 0.87 for an abnormal sonogram. The corresponding likelihood ratios were 0.04 and 9.09, respectively. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal ultrasonography seems to be an effective procedure to exclude endometrial and intrauterine abnormalities. Its use could be implemented as a routine first-step procedure in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding, and it selects those in need of further diagnostic evaluation in the case of an abnormal or inconclusive sonogram.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)547-552
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume172
Issue number2 PART 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1995

Keywords

  • abnormal uterine bleeding
  • diagnostic hysterescopy
  • Transvaginal ultrasonography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A prospective comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy in the evaluation of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding: Clinical implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this