TY - JOUR
T1 - A new conceptual model for how pressure ulcer risk is negotiated and adherence to preventative advice in the community setting
AU - Ledger, Lisa
AU - Hope, Jo
AU - Schoonhoven, Lisette
AU - Worsley, Peter R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/5
Y1 - 2025/5
N2 - Aim(s): To identify potential factors affecting patient adherence to preventative advice and to explore how pressure ulcer risk is negotiated between nurse and patient in the community setting. Design: A qualitative research design using a pragmatist approach. Methods: Observation of interactions between nurse and patient, evaluation of documentation, and semi-structured interviews with 15 community patients following the nursing interaction. Data was analysed using the principles of Thematic Analysis. Results: Five overarching themes affected patient adherence to pressure ulcer preventative advice: Patient decision-making, difficulty implementing advice, carer involvement, trust in the nurse and the nursing approach. These factors were complex, individualised, dynamic, and context and time specific. How pressure ulcer avoidance was negotiated diverged according to the type of nursing approach adopted, which impacted on adherence. Conclusion: The new conceptual model identifies the importance of an open, participatory nursing approach to support shared decision-making. It accommodates the dynamic nature of patient factors, which affect their ability to acquire and understand PU advice and adhere to preventative strategies.
AB - Aim(s): To identify potential factors affecting patient adherence to preventative advice and to explore how pressure ulcer risk is negotiated between nurse and patient in the community setting. Design: A qualitative research design using a pragmatist approach. Methods: Observation of interactions between nurse and patient, evaluation of documentation, and semi-structured interviews with 15 community patients following the nursing interaction. Data was analysed using the principles of Thematic Analysis. Results: Five overarching themes affected patient adherence to pressure ulcer preventative advice: Patient decision-making, difficulty implementing advice, carer involvement, trust in the nurse and the nursing approach. These factors were complex, individualised, dynamic, and context and time specific. How pressure ulcer avoidance was negotiated diverged according to the type of nursing approach adopted, which impacted on adherence. Conclusion: The new conceptual model identifies the importance of an open, participatory nursing approach to support shared decision-making. It accommodates the dynamic nature of patient factors, which affect their ability to acquire and understand PU advice and adhere to preventative strategies.
KW - Conceptual model
KW - Mixed methods
KW - Nursing
KW - Patient adherence
KW - Pressure ulcer
KW - Risk perception
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105000464069&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtv.2025.100890
DO - 10.1016/j.jtv.2025.100890
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105000464069
SN - 0965-206X
VL - 34
JO - Journal of Tissue Viability
JF - Journal of Tissue Viability
IS - 2
M1 - 100890
ER -