Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A longitudinal analysis of radiosensitizer development in cancer therapy

  • Paul T. Winnard
  • , Venu Raman*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

It has been 75 years since the concept of a radiosensitizer was introduced as an adjuvant drug intended to enhance radiotherapy. Starting shortly after this time, we provide a brief history of how oxygen availability and hypoxia in solid tumors came to dominate the definition of a radiosensitizer and the clinical effort to deliver oxygen to patients to sensitize their tumors to radiation. Next, we review the clinical use of three classes of drugs developed based on oxygen/hypoxia criteria for radiosensitizers, as well as a fourth class that meets the original definition of a radiosensitizer as an enhancer of ionizing radiation therapy. We also present recent preclinical evaluations of potential future radiosensitizers, including our work on RK-33, a non-toxic small-molecule inhibitor of the RNA helicase DDX3. A brief presentation of advances in monitoring hypoxia and tumor blood flow is presented. Additionally, we discuss the dynamic heterogeneity of solid tumors, which has significantly contributed to many shortcomings reported in clinical trials using hypoxia-targeting radiosensitizers. From this perspective, identifying radiosensitizers targeting multifunctional regulators, such as DDX3, may help overcome tumor heterogeneity and lead to safe, effective, and enhanced radiotherapy.

Original languageEnglish
Article number218373
JournalCancer Letters
Volume645
Early online date26 Feb 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2026

Keywords

  • Bioreductive prodrug
  • DDX3
  • Hyperbaric O
  • Oxygen
  • Oxygen mimetic
  • Oxygen-effect
  • Radiosensitizer
  • Radiotherapy
  • Respiratory inhibitor
  • RK-33

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A longitudinal analysis of radiosensitizer development in cancer therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this