Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies

  • Richard D. Riley*
  • , Karel G.M. Moons
  • , Kym I.E. Snell
  • , Joie Ensor
  • , Lotty Hooft
  • , Douglas G. Altman
  • , Jill Hayden
  • , Gary S. Collins
  • , Thomas P.A. Debray
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Prognostic factors are associated with the risk of future health outcomes in individuals with a particular health condition or some clinical start point (eg, a particular diagnosis). Research to identify genuine prognostic factors is important because these factors can help improve risk stratification, treatment, and lifestyle decisions, and the design of randomised trials. Although thousands of prognostic factor studies are published each year, often they are of variable quality and the findings are inconsistent. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are therefore needed that summarise the evidence about the prognostic value of particular factors. In this article, the key steps involved in this review process are described.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberk4597
JournalBMJ (Online)
Volume364
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • Data Collection/trends
  • Humans
  • Life Style
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic
  • Prognosis
  • Publication Bias/statistics & numerical data
  • Research Design/trends
  • Risk Assessment/trends
  • Systematic Reviews as Topic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this