TY - JOUR
T1 - A combination of immune cell types identified through ensemble machine learning strategy detects altered profile in recurrent pregnancy loss
T2 - a pilot study
AU - Benner, Marilen
AU - Feyaerts, Dorien
AU - Lopez-Rincon, Alejandro
AU - van der Heijden, Olivier W H
AU - van der Hoorn, Marie-Louise
AU - Joosten, Irma
AU - Ferwerda, Gerben
AU - van der Molen, Renate G
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare the immunologic profiles of peripheral and menstrual blood (MB) of women who experience recurrent pregnancy loss and women without pregnancy complications.DESIGN: Explorative case-control study. Cross-sectional assessment of flow cytometry-derived immunologic profiles.SETTING: Academic medical center.PATIENT(S): Women who experienced more than 2 consecutive miscarriages.INTERVENTION(S): None.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Flow cytometry-based immune profiles of uterine and systemic immunity (recurrent pregnancy loss, n = 18; control, n = 14) assessed by machine learning classifiers in an ensemble strategy, followed by recursive feature selection.RESULT(S): In peripheral blood, the combination of 4 cell types (nonswitched memory B cells, CD8+ T cells, CD56bright CD16- natural killer [NKbright] cells, and CD4+ effector T cells) classified samples correctly to their respective cohort. The identified classifying cell types in peripheral blood differed from the results observed in MB, where a combination of 6 cell types (Ki67+CD8+ T cells, (Human leukocyte antigen-DR+) regulatory T cells, CD27+ B cells, NKbright cells, regulatory T cells, and CD24HiCD38Hi B cells) plus age allowed for assigning samples correctly to their respective cohort. Based on the combination of these features, the average area under the curve of a receiver operating characteristic curve and the associated accuracy were >0.8 for both sample sources.CONCLUSION(S): A combination of immune subsets for cohort classification allows for robust identification of immune parameters with possible diagnostic value. The noninvasive source of MB holds several opportunities to assess and monitor reproductive health.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To compare the immunologic profiles of peripheral and menstrual blood (MB) of women who experience recurrent pregnancy loss and women without pregnancy complications.DESIGN: Explorative case-control study. Cross-sectional assessment of flow cytometry-derived immunologic profiles.SETTING: Academic medical center.PATIENT(S): Women who experienced more than 2 consecutive miscarriages.INTERVENTION(S): None.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Flow cytometry-based immune profiles of uterine and systemic immunity (recurrent pregnancy loss, n = 18; control, n = 14) assessed by machine learning classifiers in an ensemble strategy, followed by recursive feature selection.RESULT(S): In peripheral blood, the combination of 4 cell types (nonswitched memory B cells, CD8+ T cells, CD56bright CD16- natural killer [NKbright] cells, and CD4+ effector T cells) classified samples correctly to their respective cohort. The identified classifying cell types in peripheral blood differed from the results observed in MB, where a combination of 6 cell types (Ki67+CD8+ T cells, (Human leukocyte antigen-DR+) regulatory T cells, CD27+ B cells, NKbright cells, regulatory T cells, and CD24HiCD38Hi B cells) plus age allowed for assigning samples correctly to their respective cohort. Based on the combination of these features, the average area under the curve of a receiver operating characteristic curve and the associated accuracy were >0.8 for both sample sources.CONCLUSION(S): A combination of immune subsets for cohort classification allows for robust identification of immune parameters with possible diagnostic value. The noninvasive source of MB holds several opportunities to assess and monitor reproductive health.
KW - Recurrent pregnancy loss
KW - immunity
KW - machine learning
KW - menstrual blood
KW - miscarriage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128309717&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.xfss.2022.02.002
DO - 10.1016/j.xfss.2022.02.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 35560014
SN - 2666-335X
VL - 3
SP - 166
EP - 173
JO - F&S science
JF - F&S science
IS - 2
ER -