2-Deoxy-2[F-18]FDG-PET for detection of recurrent laryngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy: Interobserver variability in reporting

L. Van der Putten, O. S. Hoekstra, R. de Bree*, D. J. Kuik, E. F.I. Comans, J. A. Langendijk, C. R. Leemans

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate accuracy and interobserver variability in the assessment of 2-deoxy-2[F-18]fluoro-d-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for detection of recurrent laryngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy. Procedures: Eleven experienced nuclear physicians from eight centres assessed 30 FDG-PET scans on the appearance of local recurrence (negative/equivocal/positive). Conservative (equivocal analysed as negative) and sensitive (equivocal analysed as positive) assessment strategies were compared to the reference standard (recurrence within 6 months after PET). Results: Seven patients had proven recurrences. For the conservative and sensitive strategy, the mean sensitivity was 87% and 97%, specificity 81% and 63%, positive predictive values 61% and 46% and negative predictive values 96% and 99%, respectively. Interobserver variability showed a reasonable relation in comparison to the reference standard (kappa = 0.55). Conclusions: FDG-PET has acceptable interobserver agreement and yields good negative predictive value for detection of recurrent laryngeal carcinoma. It could therefore be used as first diagnostic step and may reduce futile invasive diagnostics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)294-303
Number of pages10
JournalMolecular Imaging and Biology
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Jul 2008

Keywords

  • Detection
  • FDG-PET
  • Interobserver variability
  • Laryngeal carcinoma
  • Local recurrence
  • Radiotherapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '2-Deoxy-2[F-18]FDG-PET for detection of recurrent laryngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy: Interobserver variability in reporting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this